Perspectives of key decision makers on out-of-pocket payments for medicines in the Ethiopian healthcare system: a qualitative interview study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the perspectives of key decision makers on out-of-pocket (OOP) payment for medicines and its implications in the Ethiopian healthcare system. DESIGN: A qualitative design that employed audiorecorded semistructured in-depth interviews was used in this study. The framework thematic analysis approach was followed in the analysis. SETTING: Interviewees came from five federal-level institutions engaged in policymaking (three) and tertiary referral-level healthcare service provision (two) in Ethiopia. PARTICIPANTS: Seven pharmacists, five health officers, one medical doctor and one economist who held key decision-making positions in their respective organisations participated in the study. RESULT: Three major themes were identified in the areas of the current context of OOP payment for medicines, its aggravating factors and a plan to reduce its burden. Under the current context, participants' overall opinions, circumstances of vulnerability and consequences on households were identified. Factors identified as aggravating the burden of OOP payment were deficiencies in the medicine supply chain and limitations in the health insurance system. Suggested mitigation strategies to be implemented by the health providers, the national medicines supplier, the insurance agency and the Ministry of Health were categorised under plans to reduce OOP payment. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study indicate that there is widespread OOP payment for medicines in Ethiopia. System level constraints such as weaknesses in the supply system at the national and health facility levels have been identified as critical factors that undermine the protective effects of health insurance in the Ethiopian context. Ensuring steady access to essential medicines requires addressing health system and supply constraints in addition to a well-functioning financial risk protection systems.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of current non-mandatory hepatitis B vaccination coverage vs expanding coverage among healthcare workers in Ethiopia.

BACKGROUND: Ethiopia is a country with high endemicity in Hepatitis B (HepB) virus infection. However, only 14% of healthcare workers (HCWs) are currently immunized via a non-mandatory strategy in the country. Hence, this study aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of the current vaccination coverage and increasing coverage among HCWs in Ethiopia. METHODS: Based on current practice, the study considered a monovalent HepB vaccine, which has a 90% protection rate with a complete three-dose series for lifelong protection. Markov model for current coverage (14%) and expanding vaccination coverage to 80% (as per World Health Organization (WHO) recommendation) was simulated based on the data got from both primary and secondary data. Secondary data, particularly cost and effectiveness data, were gained from published articles, WHO guidelines, and Ethiopian Federal Ministry of Health documents. Cost-related data for vaccination and chronic HepB treatment were also gathered by interviewing expertise from Tikur Anbesa specialized hospital. We conducted the study from a healthcare payer perspective, with a 3% discount rate of cost and health outcome as recommended by the WHO. The primary health outcome was measured by the Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER). We employed deterministic analysis and tornado diagrams to manage parameter uncertainty and show a plausible range of cost and effectiveness of variables. RESULTS: Current vaccination program is more expensive (USD 29.99) with a more additional cost of USD 1.32 and with reduced effectiveness of 0.08 Life Years (LYs) compared to the expanded HepB vaccination strategy which costs USD 28.67 and gives a relatively high total LY gain of 28.62. The resulting ICER was USD-16.23 per LYs gained. The negative ICER shows that the expanded HepB vaccination strategy dominated the current vaccination strategy. A one-way sensitivity analysis also revealed that the current vaccine coverage was dominated by an increase in the risk of infection among unvaccinated individuals. CONCLUSIONS: Expanded vaccination coverage (to 80%) was found the most cost-effective strategy in Ethiopian HCWs compared to the current non-mandatory vaccine coverage (14%). In addition, the results of one-way and two-way sensitivity analysis reveal the robustness of our model conclusion.